- 01 Aug, 2008 4 commits
-
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20877]
-
Moritz Kroll authored
[r20875]
-
Moritz Kroll authored
[r20872]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20871]
-
- 31 Jul, 2008 21 commits
-
-
yb9976 authored
[r20869]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20868]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20866]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20865]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20864]
-
Moritz Kroll authored
[r20863]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20862]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20857]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20856]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20855]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20854]
-
Michael Beck authored
split_by_what() function - BugFix: do not replace the Bad node - BugFix: wrong var used [r20853]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20851]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20850]
-
yb9976 authored
[r20849]
-
Moritz Kroll authored
[r20847]
-
Michael Beck authored
- BugFix: to detect that a Cmp must be reavaluated, we give the Cmp node the type true IF there is a chance that it could be evaluated [r20841]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20838]
-
Matthias Braun authored
* The underlying idea is simply wrong * the is_inside function was wrong too, so the wrong optimisation nearly never triggered [r20834]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20828]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20827]
-
- 30 Jul, 2008 15 commits
-
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20820]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20819]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20806]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20803]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20799]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20798]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20797]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20796]
-
Michael Beck authored
[r20793]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20792]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20791]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20790]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
[r20789]
-
Christoph Mallon authored
Replace be_peephole_before_exchange()+sched_remove()+exchange()+be_peephole_new_node() by the new function be_peephole_exchange(). [r20788]
-
Matthias Braun authored
[r20787]
-